
*** DISUASIÓN CON PODER *** Norte,Centro,Sud America & el Mundo |
| | | Autor | Mensaje |
|---|
**PREDATOR** GENERAL DE BRIGADA


Unidad: Chilean Air Force Mensajes: 1837 Localización: Viña del Mar Fecha de inscripción: 09/02/2010 Edad: 46
 | Tema: China vs Japón Mar 21 Sep 2010, 12:10 | |
| Abro este tema debido al reciente incidente entre estos dos paises asiaticos por la detención por parte del Japón de un pesquero de nacionalidad China. Incidente marítimo se convierte en crisis diplomática entre China y JapónPublicado por Gabriela Ulloa • La información es de Agencia AFP • El gobierno chino convocó el miércoles por quinta vez en una semana al embajador de Japón, para exigir la liberación del capitán de un barco pesquero chino detenido por los japoneses, mientras que la crisis diplomática entre ambos países comienza a preocupar a Estados Unidos. Se trata de una cantidad “impresionante” de convocatorias que muestra la firme voluntad del gobierno chino de obtener la liberación del capitán Zhan Qixiong, indicó a la AFP un diplomático occcidental, El barco y su tripulación habían sido capturados el 7 de septiembre pasado en una zona del Mar de China Oriental reclamada por ambos países. El martes, los 14 miembros de la tripulación fueron liberados y el barco devuelto a China, pero Japón mantuvo detenido al capitán de la embarcación. El viceministro de Relaciones Exteriores chino Liu Zhenmin se quejó de nuevo ante el embajador Uichiro Niwa por la detención “ilegal” del capitán del buque pesquero y reclamó su “liberación inmediata”, dijo el ministerio en su página web. El miércoles, Estados Unidos intervino por primera vez en la crisis, pidiendo a China y Japón que “solucionen pacíficamente, a través del diálogo” sus diferencias. Estados Unidos destacó de paso la alianza nipo-norteamericana, “piedra angular de la seguridad y la estabilidad en Asia”, lo que podría irritar aún más al gobierno chino. El pesquero fue abordado cerca de un grupo de islas llamadas Senkaku en japonés y Diaoyu en chino, a medio camino entre Taiwán y Okinawa. China, Japón y Taiwán se disputan la soberanía del archipiélago, zona propicia para la pesca y que contendría importantes reservas de hidrocarburos. Los hechos han derivado en un incidente diplomático y el gobierno chino ha advertido que podría tener un impacto “grave” en las relaciones chino-japonesas. Japón dijo que el asunto “sería tratado en conformidad con la ley japonesa, mientras que China advirtió que el incidente podía tener un “impacto grave” en las relaciones chino-japonesas. Desde el inicio de la crisis, China anuló una visita de parlamentarios a Japón, prevista para este miércoles, y aplazó las conversaciones bilaterales sobre exploración de hidrocarburos en mar de China Oriental. Japón consideró “muy lamentable” la suspensión de las discusiones sobre hidrocarburos. Las autoridades han impedido que los nacionalistas chinos desencadenen un discurso antinipón en internet, aunque en los últimos días circulaba un llamado a manifestar frente al consulado japonés en Shanghai, este de China. Por su lado, el diario japonés Asahi Shimbun daba cuenta de llamados a manifestar frente a la embajada japonesa en Pekín el miércoles, aniversario del comienzo de la invasión japonesa. Más allá de los litigios marítimos, las relaciones entre China y Japón siguen marcadas, a pesar de la importancia creciente de sus vínculos económicos, por una gran desconfianza heredada de la guerra sino-japonesa. La crisis actual es la primera verdadera crisis entre ambos países desde 2005, año en que se registraron manifestaciones antijaponesas, a veces violentas, en varias ciudades China debido a la revisión de los manuales japoneses de historia. En 2006 se había registrado un nuevo foco de tensión debido a la visita del primer ministro de la época, Junichiro Yasukuni, al santuario de Yasujuni, que honra a criminales de guerra japoneses. fuente:BioBio,La Radio. Honolables saludos. _________________ ***Administrador General *** |
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Mar 21 Sep 2010, 17:09 | |
| Gracias Estimado PREDATOR por permitir este tipo de temas!!! Ahora mi granito de arena!!! | Citación: | Japan-China trawler row deepens Japanese envoy summoned for fifth time over demands to free Chinese fishing boat captain held in Tokyo since last week.
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2010 06:48 GMT
Japan has asked the Chinese side to take "appropriate measures to avoid escalation of the situation"
China has summoned Japan's ambassador to demand the release of a Chinese fishing boat captain detained last week, in the worst diplomatic spat between the two regional rivals in years.
Zhan Qixiong and his crew were seized following a collision on September 7 between his trawler and two Japanese coastguard vessels in disputed waters.
Japan says Zhan rammed the two Japanese coastguard patrol vessels intentionally during a high-seas chase near disputed islands in the East China Sea, which are claimed by both countries as well as Taiwan.
The maritime incident has strained ties between the two Asian nations, and China has since summoned Uichiro Niwa, the Japanese envoy, repeatedly.
Liu Zhenmin, the Chinese assistant foreign minister, called Niwa on Tuesday to complain again over Japan's continued "illegal detention" of the Chinese skipper.
In a statement posted on the ministry's website, Liu "demanded that Japan immediately release and send back the Chinese boat captain."
The trawler's 14 crew members were released on Monday.
Chinese pressure
The Kyodo news agency citing a statement from the Japanese embassy quoted Niwa as telling Liu that China should rein in actions that could worsen the row.
"We request that the Chinese side implement appropriate measures to avoid escalation of the situation," Niwa said.
He chided China for "taking unilateral action by deliberately linking the fishing ship collision case with several unrelated issues," the Kyodo report added.
Beijing has already postponed talks with Tokyo on joint energy exploration in the East China Sea and scrapped a trip to Japan by a senior legislator in protest.
Japan on Tuesday called the situation "extremely regrettable," and has complained to China over the postponement of the energy talks.
Call for dialogue
The uninhabited islands – called Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China – lie in an area with rich fishing grounds that is also believed to contain oil and gas deposits. The area has been a frequent flashpoint of regional tensions.
Meanwhile the United States on Tuesday called for dialogue to settle the dispute.
"On this narrow issue, we hope that would be resolved peacefully through dialogue between China and Japan," Philip Crowley, a US state department spokesman, said in Washington.
He also stressed the importance of the US-Japan alliance.
The alliance "is a cornerstone of security and stability across Asia," Crowley said, and benefits Japan and "other countries in the region, including China".
Relations between Beijing and Tokyo have long been dogged by mutual distrust and Chinese bitterness over Japan's occupation of much of China before and during World War II.
Both sides have made a determined effort to improve ties since 2005 and 2006, when Chinese anger with Japan erupted in sometimes violent protests and the two countries' leaders were barely on speaking terms.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2010/09/201091551653664343.html |
Se esta poniendo bastante interesante este lado del Mundo... ya que CHINA quiere a todo fin mostrar sus musculos y ganar una guerra que no ha ganado por mucho tiempo!
Olimpus |
|  | | **PREDATOR** GENERAL DE BRIGADA


Unidad: Chilean Air Force Mensajes: 1837 Localización: Viña del Mar Fecha de inscripción: 09/02/2010 Edad: 46
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Mar 21 Sep 2010, 23:53 | |
| Creo que hoy las cosas son muy distintas a las de la WW II,hoy China maneja arsenales atomicos,es una super potencia y con la cantidad de soldados que posee,perfectamente podria aplastar al Japón. Ojalá que solo quede en dime y diretes en el ambito diplomatico.
Saludos _________________ ***Administrador General *** |
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Miér 22 Sep 2010, 00:33 | |
| No seria tan facil para los chinos, ya que ellos no tienen muchas naves anfivias y los EEUU's tienen bases por esos lados! | Citación: | Sep. 10, 2010
Japan Wary Of China Military, Urges Closer US Ties
Japan Wary Of China's Military Expansion, Stresses Importance Of US Forces In Regional Peace
(AP) TOKYO (AP) - Japan's Defense Ministry stressed the importance of U.S. military forces in Japan and cast a wary eye on China's military expansion in an annual report Friday, as diplomatic tensions with China rose following a collision near disputed islands.
The annual defense policy report also said a group of South Korean-controlled islands, called Dokdo in Korean and Takeshima in Japanese, were an "integral" part of Japanese territory - prompting protesters in South Korea's capital to try to burn a Japanese flag in a show of anger.
The report's release comes amid a growing diplomatic dispute between Japan and China. Beijing has warned Tokyo that bilateral ties could be damaged over the arrest of a Chinese fishing boat captain whose ship collided with two Japanese patrol vessels Tuesday near disputed islands in the East China Sea.
China has increased its activity in Japanese waters to defend its territory, protect its maritime interests and deter Taiwanese independence, the defense report said.
Highlighting China's increased military spending, it said Beijing's lack of openness in its defense policies and military activities were "a matter of concern for the region and the international community, including Japan, which should require prudent analysis."
It said China has not disclosed specific information about its weapons, procurement goals, details of major units and its national defense budget.
China has released defense reports every two years since 1998 but has not yet achieved the level of transparency expected for "a responsible major power in the international society," it said.
China also is developing the technology needed for possessing its own aircraft carrier, it said.
The report highlighted the importance of American forces based in Japan under a security pact that marks its 50th anniversary this year, saying they act as a deterrence that contributes to Japan's defense as well as regional security.
In particular, having U.S. forces on the southern Japanese island of Okinawa offers a strategic advantage because of its geographic location, allowing them to respond more quickly to emergencies in East Asia than if they were based in Hawaii, Guam or the U.S. mainland, it said.
However, many residents of the island of Okinawa, which hosts three-quarters of all U.S. military facilities in Japan, want the bases moved off the island.
Under a 2006 agreement to reorganize the 47,000 U.S. troops in Japan, Washington is to move 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to the U.S. territory of Guam and relocate U.S. Marine Air Station Futenma, set in the middle of a city, to a less crowded part of the island by 2014.
The report said that moving Futenma out of Okinawa - as proposed by former Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama - would hinder the Marines' response capabilities, and it was "unavoidable" to keep the base's operations on the island.
___
Associated Press Writer Mari Yamaguchi contributed to this report.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/10/ap/asia/main6852911.shtml |
Olimpus |
|  | | El_Empanada MAYOR


Unidad: No. 617 Squadron Mensajes: 979 Localización: Osorno Fecha de inscripción: 16/02/2010 Edad: 22
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Miér 22 Sep 2010, 00:37 | |
| Desde el fin de la Segunda Guerra que ninguna de las dos China ha tenido una buena relación con Japón (está demás decir que entre ellas tampoco son muy cercanas). Y se pone aún más compleja la cosa en el caso de estas islas que reclaman los tres países. |
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Miér 22 Sep 2010, 17:06 | |
| Mi opinion de esto es, de que CHINA va a retomar lo que era de ellos incluyendo a TAIWAN y la la FUERZA!!!
Hace unos anios atras movieron tropas y practicaron a como seria un ataque a la isla de TAIWAN, primero los bombardearian con misiles y despues dejarian de que la aviacion entrara a atacar lo que quedara de los aviones taiwaneses y a las baterias en las playas, para asi darle lugar a una invacion por parte de tropas.
Por lo menos en los EEUU's se paso una ley que dicta de que el pais del norte ayudaria militarmente a TAIWAN.
Pero, como esta CHINA hoy en dia... y con los avances economicos, tecnologicos y militares, ellos estarian bien parados pero en unos anios mas.
Olimpus |
|  | | Blackbird GENERAL DE BRIGADA


Unidad: 455th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron Mensajes: 1557 Localización: Santiago, Chile Fecha de inscripción: 15/02/2010 Edad: 37
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Miér 22 Sep 2010, 19:49 | |
| | **PREDATOR** escribió: | Creo que hoy las cosas son muy distintas a las de la WW II,hoy China maneja arsenales atomicos,es una super potencia y con la cantidad de soldados que posee,perfectamente podria aplastar al Japón. Ojalá que solo quede en dime y diretes en el ambito diplomatico.
Saludos |
Yo difiero de tu opinion mi estimado Jorge, si bien China es muchisimo mas en todo que Japon, China esta casi sola.....Japon no!
Perfectamente las famosas coaliciones que juegan papeles preponderantes en la guerras, pues creo que el aplastado podrian ser la China, el tema es que cualquier conflicto actual en donde el que haga las veces de "el mala onda" posea arsenales atomicos, pues es tema mas que sensible y probablemente no tendra cabida un conflicto armado por lo que podria desencadenar...
Saludos amigo_________________ _____________________________________________ Las naciones deben disponer de ejércitos eficientes, capaces de enfrentarse al enemigo en el exterior; de lo contrario, deberán prever que tendrán que enfrentarse al adversario sobre suelo propio. (Duque de Wellington) |
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Jue 23 Sep 2010, 03:56 | |
| | Blackbird escribió: | | **PREDATOR** escribió: | Creo que hoy las cosas son muy distintas a las de la WW II,hoy China maneja arsenales atomicos,es una super potencia y con la cantidad de soldados que posee,perfectamente podria aplastar al Japón. Ojalá que solo quede en dime y diretes en el ambito diplomatico.
Saludos |
Yo difiero de tu opinion mi estimado Jorge, si bien China es muchisimo mas en todo que Japon, China esta casi sola.....Japon no!
Perfectamente las famosas coaliciones que juegan papeles preponderantes en la guerras, pues creo que el aplastado podrian ser la China, el tema es que cualquier conflicto actual en donde el que haga las veces de "el mala onda" posea arsenales atomicos, pues es tema mas que sensible y probablemente no tendra cabida un conflicto armado por lo que podria desencadenar...
Saludos amigo |
Realmente CHINA tiene a algunos paises que la apoyan, tal como podria ser RUSSIA o NORTH KOREA o hasta la misma IRA que se metio al bail... como se puede apreciar en la siguiente nota:
| Citación: | Iran condemns Japan as 'pro-US stooge' in battle for United Nations seat
Iran will this week launch an audacious bid for election to the United Nations Security Council, the same body that has passed a series of resolutions against the Islamic regime for its illicit nuclear programme.
Mohamed Khaza'e, Tehran's top envoy at the UN, was dismissive of Japan's pitch for what would be its 10th two-year stint on the council. Last week he told state-run Iranian radio that Tokyo "does not play a significant role in international and political affairs" and should step aside.
He noted that some 140 nations have either never sat on the Security Council, or have been a member just once - as Iran was under the Shah in 1955-56, more than two decades before the country's Islamic revolution.
In the increasingly bitter battle before the whole UN General Assembly votes in mid-October on the replacement for Indonesia, Iranian diplomats have been quietly briefing that Japan is merely a stooge of the US.
Iran's appeal to the Islamic world will be a powerful card. Many Muslim nations already feel under-represented on the Security Council, even before Indonesia, the world's most populous Islamic state, ends its two-year stint.
The council has five permanent nations with veto powers - the US, Britain, France, Russia and China - and 10 rotating members who do not have the right to veto. To secure a seat, a country must win the backing of two-thirds (or 128 votes) of the 192 members of the General Assembly.
Japan will support its latest candidacy by citing its status as the second-largest contributor to the UN budget, its experience on the council and its commitment to the UN's principles - a claim that Iran will struggle to make after its repeated condemnation in New York.
The US and its Western allies are expected to limit their pro-Japanese lobbying to low-profile background diplomacy in an attempt to avoid a backlash in favour of Iran.
In a similar clash between pro- and anti-US candidates in 2006 for the Latin American seat, Venezuela and Guatemala went head-to-head. Heavy American lobbying for Guatemala against its strident foe Hugo Chavez of Venezuela only deepened the divide and neither country managed to win two-thirds support in a remarkable 47 rounds of voting. Panama eventually emerged as a compromise candidate for the regional bloc on the 48th round.
As it has in recent years, Iran is certain to feature prominently in the General Assembly's calendar, even without its bid for Security Council membership.
The EU negotiating troika of Britain, France and Germany plus the other three permanent Security Council members of the US, Russia and China will meet for the latest bout of talks on Iran's nuclear programme.
And President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is certain to court his usual controversy on his annual visit to New York focussed around his address to the general assembly on Sept 23 - the same day that his bitter foe, President George W Bush, and Security General Ban Ki-moon will speak.
On Friday, the Anti-Defamation League, a predominantly Jewish group, angrily condemned five pacifist religious organisations for arranging a dinner with the Iranian leader, who has denied the Holocaust and called for Israel to be wiped off the map.
Abraham Foxman, ADL national director, said: "Their breaking bread with President Ahmadinejad is a perversion of the search for peace and an appalling betrayal of religious values."
The Mennonite Central Committee, the Quakers, the World Council of Churches, Religions for Peace and the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) have invited Mr Ahmadinejad to break the Ramadan fast with dinner during his visit to New York.
"This is a private event, part of an ongoing series of discussions with Iran because we believe that keeping dialogue open is the best way to diffuse conflict rather than resorting to belligerent rhetoric and threats," an AFSC spokesman told The Sunday Telegraph.
Mr Ahmadinejad prompted further outrage on Friday when he vowed to keep supporting the Palestinian militant group Hamas until the "collapse" of Israel.
He told Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh that Iran views the support of the Palestinian people as part of its religious and national duty and that Iran will stand behind the Palestinian nation "until the big victory feast which is the collapse of the Zionist regime".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/2711668/Israel-could-capture-Iranian-President-Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad.html |
Olimpus
|
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Jue 23 Sep 2010, 04:15 | |
| Esta noticia es de June del 2005, pero nos da a conocer una noticia que quizas muchos no sabian... hasta TAIWAN dice que unas islas ocupadas por JAPAN les pertenece a ellos. | Citación: | 06/21/2005 12:13 JAPAN - TAIWAN
Taiwanese warships in islands claimed by Japan
Even China has laid a claim on Diaoyu, rich in fishing stocks and natural gas repositories.
Taipei (AsiaNews/agencies) – A Taiwan warship has sailed to the Diaoyu islands for an "inspection tour". The islands, known in Japan as Senkaku, are claimed by Japan and China. Today, 21 June, Taiwanese defence minister, Lee Jye, and 15 members of parliament – including Wang Jin-pyng, parliamentary spokesman – sailed on a 3,800 tonne Knox class frigate "Fengyang" headed for the islands to make "an inspection of Taiwan waters". The frigate is escorted by other ships and planes at a distance, said military spokesman, Liou Chih-chien. The trip should last eight hours and wind up in the afternoon.
Wang said: "this area belongs to us historically, geographically and legally. We must defend our sovereignty, and protect the rights of our fishermen." Taiwanese fishermen have been chased out of the zone by Japanese coastguards, and Japan has often imposed fines and detained fishing boats which entered the 200 nautical-mile zone, rich in fishing stocks. Japan stakes a claim on the territory, which stretches as far as the north-east territorial waters of Taiwan. Fishermen have protested forcefully, insisting they were in Taiwan waters, they also threatened to ask China for help and to hoist its flag if their government did not protect them.
Their cause has been strongly supported by the political opposition. Ma Ying-jeou, Taipei mayor, even called for "military action to force [Japan] to reach a compromise."
The islands are the heart of a controversy involving Japan, China and Taiwan, not least because of the exploitation of rich natural gas repositories.
On Monday 20 June, Tadashi Ikeda, Japanese representative in Taipei, make known to the Taiwanese foreign affairs minister that Japan "did not consider it appropriate" to send a warship to protect fishermen and that "it could not guarantee it would not take any action if Taiwanese warships" crossed the border.
Even if the two states have no diplomatic links, they have always maintained amicable relations: Tokyo has always been considered as an ally against Beijing's reunification claims on the island. Besides, Japan is Taiwan's main trading partner.
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Taiwanese-warships-in-islands-claimed-by-Japan-3551.html |
Olimpus |
|  | | **PREDATOR** GENERAL DE BRIGADA


Unidad: Chilean Air Force Mensajes: 1837 Localización: Viña del Mar Fecha de inscripción: 09/02/2010 Edad: 46
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Jue 23 Sep 2010, 10:37 | |
| | Blackbird escribió: | | **PREDATOR** escribió: | Creo que hoy las cosas son muy distintas a las de la WW II,hoy China maneja arsenales atomicos,es una super potencia y con la cantidad de soldados que posee,perfectamente podria aplastar al Japón. Ojalá que solo quede en dime y diretes en el ambito diplomatico.
Saludos |
Yo difiero de tu opinion mi estimado Jorge, si bien China es muchisimo mas en todo que Japon, China esta casi sola.....Japon no!
Perfectamente las famosas coaliciones que juegan papeles preponderantes en la guerras, pues creo que el aplastado podrian ser la China, el tema es que cualquier conflicto actual en donde el que haga las veces de "el mala onda" posea arsenales atomicos, pues es tema mas que sensible y probablemente no tendra cabida un conflicto armado por lo que podria desencadenar...
Saludos amigo |
Igual no me gustaria ver a los Chinos atacando a Japón,ya que esta acción podria generar una escalada de incalculables consecuencias,el mismo Korea del Norte esta esperando su momento y el estallidos de una guerra en la zona asiatica podria generar el ingreso de este pais al supuesto conflico en ayuda de sus pares comunistas de China.
Preocupados saludos _________________ ***Administrador General *** |
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Jue 23 Sep 2010, 17:09 | |
| | Citación: | Clinton urges dialogue to resolve China-Japan row
NEW YORK (AFP) - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged Japan Thursday to pursue dialogue with China in a bid to resolve quickly a row over a Chinese trawler captain detained near islands claimed by both countries.
The United States also stressed the need to avoid an escalation of the row as Japanese media reported Clinton told Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara in New York that the islands are covered by the Japan-US security treaty.
Under the 1960 treaty, the United States is obliged to defend Japan against any attack on a territory under Tokyo's administration.
In meeting with Maehara, Clinton sought to "encourage dialogue and (voiced) hope that the issue can be resolved soon," her spokesman Philip Crowley said, adding that Japan-China ties "are vitally important to regional stability."
Maehara told the chief US diplomat that Tokyo is trying to resolve the row based on its legal process and international law, Crowley told reporters after the meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.
"We are not mediating per se. We have not been asked to play a particular role," he said, adding that this is an an issue two "mature countries" like China and Japan are "fully capable of resolving."
"Our sense is that neither side wants to see this situation escalate to the point that has long-term regional impact," Crowley said.
He added: "We continue to encourage both sides to do everything to resolve it and certainly not to escalate it."
He said that the dispute also came up earlier this week in US-Chinese talks.
US President Barack Obama met Thursday in New York with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who told the UN General Assembly his country would not threaten another nation but would not yield in disputes over its national interests.
"When it comes to sovereignty, national unity and territorial integrity, China will not yield or compromise," Wen said in a speech.
But Wen insisted that China would not seek hostilities.
He did not mention the islands dispute or other tensions in Asia.
Obama was also due to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan but Crowley said he could not predict whether the spat would come up in the high-level US talks with either country.
Maehara's press secretary Satoru Satoh told AFP late Wednesday that Japan wants to communicate with China but that no meetings are planned yet between Japanese and Chinese officials in New York.
Maehara told reporters after his meeting here that Clinton had acknowledged the Senkaku islands -- known as the Dadirectlyioyu islands by China -- were subject to the treaty, Kyodo News Agency reported from New York.
"According to the Japanese minister, Clinton said that the Senkakus... are subject to Article 5 of the bilateral security treaty, which authorizes the US to protect Japan in the event of an armed attack 'in the territories under the administration of Japan'," the report said.
The dispatch did not quote Maehara .
China's premier has threatened "further actions" if Japan does not release the trawler captain, who was detained September 7 by the Japanese coast guard near the islands in the East China Sea between Taiwan and Japan's Okinawa island.
Crowley said the United States takes no position on the sovereignty of the islands.
China has summoned Japan's ambassador five times, demanded the release of the boat's captain and scrapped talks on joint exploration of a gas field near the disputed islands.
China, meanwhile, Thursday denied a report that it had blocked exports to Japan of rare earth minerals to Japan, which are essential for making iPods, electric cars, missiles and a range of other products.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/afp/100923/usa/china_japan_diplomacy_dispute_un_us |
Todo esto esta bien interesante!
Olimpus |
|  | | Lord_Scythe CAPITÁN


Mensajes: 827 Localización: CANADA Fecha de inscripción: 05/07/2010
 | Tema: Re: China vs Japón Vie 24 Sep 2010, 21:47 | |
| | Citación: | Chinese Trawler Captain Returns Home From Detention in Japan
September 24, 2010, 5:02 PM EDT
By Sachiko Sakamaki
Sept. 25 (Bloomberg) -- A Chinese fishing boat captain whose 17-day detention in Japan sent relations between Asia’s two biggest economies to their worst level in five years returned home after prosecutors released him.
Zhan Qixiong arrived in Fuzhou in China’s southeastern province of Fujian early today on a chartered flight, accompanied by officials from the foreign and agricultural ministries, Xinhua News Agency reported. China is demanding an apology and compensation, Xinhua said, citing a Foreign Ministry statement.
The release may defuse tensions that rose with the arrest after the boat collided with two Japanese Coast Guard vessels on Sept. 7 near uninhabited islets claimed by both countries. China cut off ministerial talks, and Premier Wen Jiabao this week urged Japan to “immediately and unconditionally” release him or face further retaliation.
“We believe this will significantly reduce tensions,” State Department spokesman Philip J. Crowley told reporters in New York yesterday. “It was a proper decision for Japan to make.”
At the same time, questions over the timing may open Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s government to criticism that it backed down under Chinese pressure. Japan’s request earlier this week for “high level” talks to resolve the dispute was rejected.
“The decision invites questions as to whether the authorities were deliberately ambiguous,” said Yasunori Sone, a political science professor at Tokyo’s Keio University. “This will prompt criticism.”
National Government Denial
Japan’s top government spokesman sought to dispel any suggestion the national government was involved in the decision to release the captain, who was being held in the southernmost prefecture of Okinawa.
“It was the decision of the Okinawa prosecutors and we accept that,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshito Sengoku said in Tokyo. “It’s an undeniable fact that there were signs that Japan-China ties may have deteriorated.”
China’s foreign ministry reiterated that Japan’s proceedings were illegal and invalid, Xinhua said.
The Chinese boat “was simply trying to escape the Coast Guard vessels; the collision wasn’t intentional,” Deputy Public Prosecutor Toru Suzuki said in a press conference from Naha, the prefectural capital. “Taking into account the impact on our citizens and Japan-China relations, our judgment was that it would have been excessive to prolong the investigation and his detention.”
Gas Reserves
The islands, known as Diaoyu in Chinese and Senkaku in Japanese, are in the East China Sea near natural gas fields. The two countries signed an agreement in 2008 that has yet to be implemented to jointly develop the fields.
Yesterday’s announcement of the pending release came hours after Japan’s government said four of its citizens are being held in China for allegedly videotaping military targets. The four are employees of Fujita Corp., and were in Hebei, China, on company business unrelated to military issues, company spokesman Yoshiaki Onodera said.
“We don’t think this has a link to the Senkaku issue raised by China,” Sengoku said at an earlier press conference.
He couldn’t confirm reports that China has cut off exports of rare earths -- materials used in hybrid vehicles and laptop computers -- to Japan. A Chinese government official denied the report Sept. 23.
Japan is China’s second-biggest trading partner after the U.S., with two-way commerce in the first seven months of the year rising 25 percent from the same period in 2009 to $65.2 billion, Chinese customs data show. China is Japan’s largest trading partner, buying 10.2 trillion yen ($121 billion) of the nation’s goods and services last year.
Second-Biggest Economy
China surpassed Japan as the world’s second-largest economy last quarter. The Japanese nominal gross domestic product for the second quarter totaled $1.288 trillion, less than China’s $1.337 trillion, according to Japanese government statistics.
“It will be negative for Japan, China and the global economy if ties between the countries with the No. 2 and No. 3 GDPs deteriorate,” Japanese Finance Minister Yoshihiko Noda said. “It’s desirable for both nations to address this calmly.”
Sengoku two days ago proposed “high level” talks between the two countries to ease the conflict. China rejected the suggestion, with Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu saying that “playing tricks to deceive the world and international public opinion is not a way out.”
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged Japan and China to resolve the issue through dialogue, as American officials declined to step into a broader territorial dispute.
Sovereignty Issue
The U.S. encourages “both sides to work aggressively to resolve” their differences “as quickly as possible,” Crowley said Sept. 23 in New York, where Clinton met with Japanese Foreign Minister Seiji Maehara on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly’s annual meeting. “We don’t take a position on the sovereignty of the Senkakus,” Crowley said.
U.S. President Barack Obama met separately with Kan and Wen Sept. 23. He didn’t raise the dispute in his meeting with the Chinese premier, said Jeff Bader, Obama’s director of Asian affairs.
The diplomatic row is the most serious since 2005, when thousands of Chinese protested Japanese textbooks that downplayed the nation’s wartime atrocities. The captain’s detention sparked a Sept. 18 protest outside Japan’s embassy in Beijing that was more tightly controlled by police than those five years ago, when demonstrators threw rocks at the consulate in Shanghai.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-24/chinese-trawler-captain-returns-home-from-detention-in-japan.html |
Para mi, de que los roces entre los dos paises van a continuar, ya que no son nada nuevo - en especial por parte de CHINA.
Olimpus |
|  | | |
Temas similares |  |
|
| | Permiso de este foro: | No puedes responder a temas en este foro.
| |
| |
| |
|